91- 9266157676

info@anastasis.in

The Role of Mental Flexibility

in Solving QA Questions

for CAT

By Anastasis May 17, 2025 Most Read

There’s this stubborn myth that floats around during CAT prep season: "If you just cram enough formulas, memorise enough tricks, and solve a hundred questions a day, you’ll automatically ace Quant."

It sounds reassuring. But, unfortunately, it’s about as true as believing that just buying new running shoes will make you marathon-ready. Because when it comes to QA, what really matters is your mental flexibility.

It's not about how many formulas you can recite at 3 AM or how many times you’ve mugged up a shortcut for a specific question type.

But how easily your mind can bend, twist, reframe, and move on when the paper doesn’t look like what you prepared for.

Your First Plan of Attack Might Fail, and That's Part of the Game

There’s something weirdly comforting about walking into a question thinking, "Okay, this looks like a Time-Speed-Distance problem. I’ll set up my usual equations and cruise through."

And then somewhere around the third line, the units don’t match, and suddenly, you’re stuck. At that point, it’s not your formula bank that saves you. It’s your ability to step back, breathe, and think, "What else can I try? Alternate ratios? Relative speed? Maybe plug numbers instead?"

The students who thrive in QA aren't the ones who always spot the right method first. They’re the ones who aren’t married to their first idea, who are willing to drop it, no ego, no panic, and pivot to another approach in under thirty seconds.

Flexibility Turns Ugly Questions into Manageable Ones

You know that feeling when you read a question and your brain immediately screams,

"Nope. Impossible. Next." We have all been there.

Sometimes it’s your brain stuck in a box, expecting the problem to look exactly like something you practiced. This is where mental flexibility gives you another option, and you start asking yourself smarter questions like:

  • Can I reframe this in simpler terms?
  • Is there a pattern hiding here?
  • Can I assume values instead of working with variables?
  • Is there any elimination possible?

You stop seeing QA questions as locked fortresses, but as puzzles with multiple doors, and you only need to find one that opens.